David Anthony Harper - #112993
Current Status: Disbarred
This member is prohibited from practicing law in California by order of the California Supreme Court.
See below for more details.
The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.
2015 W Cheyenne Road
Colorado Springs, CO 80906
|Phone Number:||Not Available|
|Fax Number:||Not Available|
||Undergraduate School:||Univ of Florida; Gainesville FL|
|Sections:||None||Law School:||Santa Clara Univ SOL; Santa Clara CA|
|Effective Date||Status Change|
|3/21/2014||Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA|
|5/17/1984||Admitted to The State Bar of California|
Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law in California
State Bar Court Cases
NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx
DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.
|Effective Date||Case Number||Description|
|10/19/2015||15-O-12442||Order re Entry of Default [PDF]|
|4/28/2015||12-J-10708||MPRE Suspension Order [PDF]|
|3/21/2014||12-J-10708||Opinion [PDF] [WORD]|
California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries
Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.
November 20, 2017
DAVID ANTHONY HARPER [#112993], 63, of Colorado Springs, was disbarred Nov. 20, 2016 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court.Harper’s default was entered after he did not file a response to a notice of disciplinary charges alleging that he failed to complete Ethics School as required by the terms of his disciplinary probation. Because he did not move to have the default set aside or vacated within 90 days as required under rule 5.85 of the State Bar’s Rules of Procedure, he was disbarred and the charges against him deemed admitted.He had one prior record of discipline.
March 21, 2014
DAVID ANTHONY HARPER [#112993], 60, of Maitland, Fla. was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on one year of probation with an actual 90-day suspension and ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. The order took effect March 21, 2014.In 2011, Harper was suspended for 91 days in Florida, where he is also licensed to practice law, based on unsubstantiated accusations he made in disqualification motions against four Florida judges as well as other misrepresentations he made to the court. A State Bar Court hearing judge found that Harper’s Florida suspension warranted discipline in California and recommended a 90-day suspension.In upholding the hearing judge’s recommendation, a three-judge review panel noted that Harper received due process and that the judge’s ruling “presents a careful, eminently fair, and objective rendition of the record and soundly applies the governing law.“Harper’s misrepresentations and unfounded attacks against judges show his lack of appreciation for the ethical requirements of the legal profession,” the panel wrote.In the case that led to his discipline, Harper represented his mother in a lawsuit she filed against United States Automobile Association. In 2008, he got into a relatively minor dispute with opposing counsel over his failure to properly coordinate the date and time of a hearing on a motion. The matter “quickly and inexplicably escalated into Harper’s relentless campaign against the judges in Seminole County.” Over the course of 10 months, from June 2008 to April 2009, Harper filed at least 10 pleadings seeking to disqualify four judges who were assigned sequentially to the case. All of the pleadings contained serious accusations of bias that were unfounded.Harper also made misrepresentations to the Florida appellate court. In a petition to disqualify one judge, for instance, he misrepresented the judge’s previous rulings by quoting only portions of her sworn testimony in response to the petition to disqualify. By taking her testimony out of context, it completely changed the meaning.The panel assigned some mitigation to his 27 years of practicing law without discipline.