Karl Werner Schoth - #113572
Current Status: Disbarred
This member is prohibited from practicing law in California by order of the California Supreme Court.
See below for more details.
The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.
Schoth Creyaufmiller& Assoc
1905 E Rt 66 #102
Glendora, CA 91740
|Phone Number:||(626) 963-7161|
|Fax Number:||(626) 963-7163|
||Undergraduate School:||Univ of British Columbia; Canada|
|Sections:||None||Law School:||Southwestern Univ SOL; Los Angeles CA|
|Effective Date||Status Change|
|5/15/2012||Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA|
|7/1/2011||Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA|
|6/13/1984||Admitted to The State Bar of California|
Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law in California
State Bar Court Cases
NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx
DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.
|Effective Date||Case Number||Description|
|3/22/2012||10-O-10777||Modification Order [PDF]|
California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries
Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.
September 13, 2013
KARL WERNER SCHOTH [#113572], 58, of Glendora, was disbarred Sept. 13, 2013 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court.Schoth stipulated to misappropriating $136,430 from five clients to pay family expenses, but sought review of the hearing judge’s recommendation that he be disbarred. Schoth asserted that disbarment was excessive because he was suffering from a traumatic personal crisis at the time of his misconduct.A three-judge panel upheld the hearing judge’s disbarment recommendation, finding that the mitigation in Schoth’s case “does not clearly predominate, given the seriousness of Schoth’s misconduct, which occurred over a long period of time and was aggravated by additional dishonesty and significant harm to a client who was destitute and in poor health.”Schoth, who had long maintained a successful personal injury practice, started experiencing problems in 2005 after learning that a family member had been drugged and raped at a party. He began to drink heavily, could not stay focused and only tried two cases between November 2005 and the end of 2010, causing his family’s income to drop significantly. After exhausting his family’s savings, Schoth turned to his client trust account.The first misappropriation occurred in 2009, when Schoth was required to maintain $117,352 in inheritance money in his client trust account. But by the end of 2009, the balance in the client trust account was just $1,760. When the beneficiaries of the estate, one of whom was struggling financially and in poor health, asked about the money, Schoth told them it was tied up in probate proceedings when, in fact, he was using it for his personal expenses. By the end of March 2011, he had paid the beneficiaries all the money they were owed.Schoth also failed to maintain adequate funds in his client trust account on behalf of four other clients during the fall of 2009. In each case, Schoth distributed all of the funds due to his clients, but delayed paying their lienholders, often for several months, and used these funds for his personal expenses.In mitigation, Schoth had 25 years of discipline-free practice prior to the misconduct, was suffering from extreme emotional difficulties, showed candor and cooperated with the disciplinary proceedings and was remorseful for his wrongdoing. A number of witnesses also testified to Schoth’s good character.