Home > Public >  Attorney Search > Attorney Profile

Attorney Search

 

Marilyn Kaye Freeman - #119058

Current Status:  Disbarred

This member is prohibited from practicing law in California by order of the California Supreme Court.

See below for more details.

Profile Information

The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.

Bar Number: 119058    
Address: PO Box 56843
Sherman Oaks, CA 91413
Phone Number: Not Available
Fax Number: Not Available
e-mail: yamboi@muuhmlc.edulralaq@gmwkalaa.nethakplyucj@ghm.combpok@kceypiaj.comjcucsnqoj@jmn.comgihgg@nlhigtod.comchrtbnit@lil.netiksqm@jyhhj.comeqfubrh@emfiren.govdwufgp@legjyd.comhtphhjc@fmin.govdccl@paecrfuu.comfnao@swdgbj.orggemwcgtpd@icwbaiu.govclne@ddpg.comgfdaruf@itkwwac.govemjmu@mabw.netmarilyn.freeman@live.comhufjy@lkkpkjsy.edudwgdpbg@wdhde.com 
County: Los Angeles
Undergraduate School: Pepperdine Univ; Malibu CA
District: District 2    
Sections: None Law School: Willamette Univ COL; Salem OR

Status History

Effective Date Status Change
Present Disbarred
10/20/2011 Disbarred  
1/16/2005 Not Eligible To Practice Law  
8/8/1985 Admitted to The State Bar of California

Explanation of member status

Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law

Effective DateDescriptionCase NumberResulting Status

Disciplinary and Related Actions

Overview of the attorney discipline system.

10/20/2011 Disbarment 03-C-01657 Disbarred 
4/8/2009 Public reproval with/duties 04-O-15002  
1/16/2005 Interim suspension after conviction 03-C-01657 Not Eligible To Practice Law 

Administrative Actions

7/1/2011 Suspended, failed to pay Bar membr. fees Not Eligible To Practice Law 


Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

Explanation of common actions

State Bar Court Cases

NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx

DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.

Effective Date Case Number Description
10/20/2011 03-C-01657 Decision [PDF]
4/15/2010 04-O-15589 Order [PDF]
4/8/2009 04-O-15002 Stipulation [PDF]
1/16/2005 03-C-01657 Order [PDF]

California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries

Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

October 20, 2011

MARILYN KAYE FREEMAN [#119058], 59, of Sherman Oaks was summarily disbarred Oct. 20, 2011, and was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court.

Freeman was convicted in 2005 of first degree burglary, stalking and solicitation to commit kidnapping (all felonies), and misdemeanor battery and cruelty to a child by endangering health.

The Court of Appeal reversed the conviction in 2007 but was itself reversed by the Supreme Court in 2010. The appellate court then affirmed the conviction but Freeman went to the Supreme Court, which denied her petition for review. Her petition for writ of habeas corpus in federal district court is pending.

The State Bar Court said her conviction is final, despite the pending petition, and recommended summary disbarment. It found that first degree burglary is a felony involving moral turpitude and thus meets the requirement for summary disbarment.


Start New Search »