Home > Public >  Attorney Search > Attorney Profile

Attorney Search

Charles Hernan Carreon - #127139

Current Status:  Active

This member is active and may practice law in California.

See below for more details.

Profile Information

The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.

Bar Number: 127139    
Address: 1476 Siskiyou Blvd # 7
Ashland, OR 97520
Map it
Phone Number: (628) 227-4059
Fax Number: Not Available
e-mail: hajhj@wskbgomm.govrukcqbtei@ifikna.neterkubcs@hbkufh.netooloi@rbf.orgblljqeple@ocu.comlimeafo@dlrrrynp.comwfmyh@mhba.govicmqphlra@wakrba.govsynlyik@wyao.netftngh@inulc.netpqoaokhas@euyjgliw.orglwlodgols@ord.edubbktt@pcto.orgoekbler@wcklkum.eduehjgedsfy@iuoysm.govrjjmt@tta.comhmjrmbw@cpeow.netupiyeyyyd@cac.netchascarreon@gmail.comawhkmuc@gew.edu 
County: Non-California
Undergraduate School: Southern Oregon University; Ashland OR
District: Outside California    
Sections: None Law School: UCLA SOL; Los Angeles CA

Status History

Effective Date Status Change
Present Active
11/20/2006 Active  
9/21/2006 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA  
1/24/1997 Active  
1/1/1995 Inactive  
1/14/1987 Admitted to The State Bar of California

Explanation of member status

Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law in California

Effective DateDescriptionCase NumberResulting Status

Disciplinary and Related Actions

Overview of the attorney discipline system.

9/21/2006 Discipline w/actual suspension 05-J-04474 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 

Administrative Actions

This member has no public record of administrative actions.

Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

Explanation of common actions

State Bar Court Cases

NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx

DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.

Effective Date Case Number Description
9/21/2006 05-J-04474 Stipulation [PDF] [HTML]
9/21/2006 05-J-04474 Modification Order [PDF]

California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries

Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

September 21, 2006

CHARLES H. CARREON [#127139], 50, of Pacifica was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation with an actual 60-day suspension and was ordered to take the MPRE and prove his rehabilitation. The order took effect Sept. 21, 2006.

Carreon, who is licensed in both California and Oregon, was disciplined in Oregon for practicing without a license in Canada. He represented a U.S. corporation as house counsel for its business operations in Vancouver, British Columbia, but he was not licensed there.

As counsel for the company, he held in trust settlement proceeds from a litigation matter. Without consulting with his client, Carreon used $1,400 of the settlement money to pay a money judgment obtained for a residential lease he had signed in connection with his employment in Canada. He knew or should have known that the company disputed whether he was entitled to payment for the lease as a reimbursable expense.

The Oregon order found that Carreon violated his duty to maintain client funds in trust. The violation amounted to a violation of the California Rules of Professional Conduct. Practicing law in a jurisdiction where he was not entitled to do so also violated the California rules.

In mitigation, Carreon has no prior record of discipline and no clients were harmed.

Start New Search »