William G. Panzer - #128684
The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.
370 Grand Ave #3
Oakland, CA 94610
|Phone Number:||(510) 834-1892|
|Fax Number:||Not Available|
||Undergraduate School:||Univ of California Berkeley; Berkeley CA|
|Sections:||None||Law School:||Golden Gate Univ SOL; San Francisco CA|
Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law in California
|This member has no public record of administrative actions.|
Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.
State Bar Court Cases
NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets.aspx
DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.
|Effective Date||Case Number||Description|
|10/29/2010||07-O-10203||Order Temp Stay [PDF]|
|10/28/2010||07-O-10203||MPRE Suspension Order [PDF]|
California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries
Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.
October 3, 2009
WILLIAM G. PANZER [#128684], 55, of Oakland was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect Oct. 3, 2009.Panzer stipulated to three counts of misconduct committed during his representation of a couple who hired him to contest the seizure and proposed forfeiture of more than $400,000 taken when they were arrested on drug charges.The clients provided Panzer with copies of various notices they had received from the Drug Enforcement Agency; each notice specified a deadline to contest the asset forfeiture as well as advice concerning filing a petition for remission or mitigation.Panzer made a claim for the seized funds on the deadline, but it was not received at the DEA until after the deadline and was therefore rejected. He never advised his clients whether to seek remission and/or mitigation.After he wrote a letter to the DEA complaining that the forfeiture was illegal due to a pending criminal indictment of his clients, he did no further work. The DEA issued a declaration of forfeiture of $400,300.Panzer did not inform his clients of any developments in their case, although they asked for the status of their matter for three years. He told the clients on one occasion that he thought the forfeiture was illegal.The clients eventually were convicted of crimes related to the possession and distribution of chemicals used to manufacture methamphetamine. They continued to try to learn the status of the forfeiture for another year. Five years passed between the time Panzer was hired and the last e-mail sent by the clients.He stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently, keep his clients informed of developments in their case or respond to their reasonable status inquiries.In mitigation, he had no prior discipline record in 14 years of practice.