Home > Public >  Attorney Search > Attorney Profile

Attorney Search

Joseph Henry Marman - #129517

Attorney Provided Information

The information below was provided by the attorney and has not been verified or monitored. The State Bar does not recommend or endorse any attorney.


Practice Area(s):
Civil Rights
Criminal Law
Medical Malpractice
Personal Injury

Other Language(s) Spoken by this Attorney:

Current Status:  Not eligible to practice law (Not Entitled)

See below for more details.

Profile Information

The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.

Bar Number: 129517
8421 Auburn Blvd #145
Citrus Heights, CA 95610-0394
Map it
Phone Number: (916) 721-3324
Fax Number: Not Available
e-mail: jstgowalf@qujjg.govmwwap@kktopgay.orgpbaqrsu@ksooo.orgeamwefmds@hdrfej.orgrgbl@srd.netgmmbs@ydwwi.edutsbona@dlnu.govfkmeqektk@mads.orgqeaowoft@pyqpsusi.comdumbdaat@akkd.govooaliks@riwdotqn.netbimwnt@udpjud.govmcair@iuna.govytls@pduaiihc.govknaeebwuk@tbowhdi.nethoapkfeg@yettj.orgtumffsjgy@qdijdn.govjdbsbjogm@fjui.edumarmanla@localnet.comlpbwo@bfqogy.gov 
Undergraduate School:
Univ of Montana; Missoula MT
Law School:
Univ of N. Calif/Lorenzo Patino SOL; CA
County: Sacramento
District: District 3

Status History

Effective Date Status Change
Present Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA
1/20/2015 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA  
10/7/2000 Active  
9/7/2000 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA  
9/12/1995 Active  
7/14/1995 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA  
9/15/1987 Admitted to The State Bar of California

Explanation of member status

Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law in California

Effective DateDescriptionCase NumberResulting Status

Disciplinary and Related Actions

Overview of the attorney discipline system.

11/4/2016 Vol.inactive(tender of resign.w/charges) 16-Q-17331 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 
8/30/2016 Notice of Disc Charges Filed in SBCt 16-N-15019  
3/25/2016 Discipline w/actual suspension 10-C-08329 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 
9/3/2015 Ordered inactive 10-C-08329 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 
1/20/2015 Ordered inactive 10-C-08329 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 
9/7/2000 Discipline w/actual suspension 98-O-01683 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 
4/25/1998 Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 95-O-15064  
7/14/1995 Discipline w/actual suspension 92-O-13001 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 

Administrative Actions

This member has no public record of administrative actions.

Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

Explanation of common actions

State Bar Court Cases

NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx

DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.

Effective Date Case Number Description
3/25/2016 10-C-8329 Decision [PDF]
1/20/2015 10-C-8329 Order re Inactive Enrollment [PDF]
Pending 16-N-15019 Amended Initiating Document [PDF]
Pending 16-N-15019 Amended Response [PDF]
Pending 16-Q-17331   [PDF]

California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries

Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

March 25, 2016

JOSEPH HENRY MARMAN [#129517], 60, of Citrus Heights, was suspended from the practice of law for two years and until he provides proof of his rehabilitation. He was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court and take the MPRE. In addition, he was placed on three years’ probation and faces a two-year suspension if he fails to comply with his disciplinary probation. The order took effect March 25, 2016.

Marman was suspended after being terminated from the State Bar Court’s Alternative Discipline Program for failing to comply with the program’s requirements. He had tested positive for alcohol in one lab test, missed another test and had an unexcused absence from his Lawyer Assistance Program group.

Marman’s underlying discipline stems from three criminal convictions. In October 2010, he pleaded no contest to driving with a blood alcohol level of .08 or higher after he was pulled over for driving 40 mph in a 55 mph zone, then accelerating to 65 and crossing into oncoming traffic.

In March 2013, he pleaded no contest to a reduced charge of fighting in public after he was arrested for assaulting his girlfriend. In February 2007, he pleaded no contest to reckless driving.

September 7, 2000

JOSEPH HENRY MARMAN [#129517], 44, of Citrus Heights was suspended for 90 days, stayed, placed on one year of probation with an actual 30-day suspension and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect Sept. 7, 2000.

Marman stipulated that he did not comply with probation conditions attached to a 1995 disciplinary order by failing to pay restitution to two creditors.

In mitigation, he cooperated with the bar’s investigation and he had serious financial problems.

April 25, 1998

JOSEPH HENRY MARMAN [#129517], 42, of Citrus Heights was suspended for 14 days, stayed, and placed on one year of probation. The order took effect April 25, 1998.

Marman practiced law while suspended in 1995.

As part of his probation in that matter, he was ordered to make restitution to nine parties over a four-year period. He submitted proof of restitution for three payments and claimed he made seven additional payments, but did not submit satisfactory proof. He indicated he was financially unable to continue making the payments.

Marman cooperated with the bar's investigation and harmed no clients by his misconduct.

The 1995 discipline was the result of client trust account violations and failing to properly supervise his staff.

Start New Search »