Scott Cummings McKee - #154077
Attorney Provided Information
The information below was provided by the attorney and has not been verified or monitored. The State Bar does not recommend or endorse any attorney.
Current Status: Disbarred
This member is prohibited from practicing law in California by order of the California Supreme Court.
See below for more details.
The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.
|Bar Number: 154077|
2121 1/2 Raymond Ave
Altadena, CA 91001
Fax Number: Not Available
St Mary's Univ; San Antonio TX
Southwestern Univ SOL; Los Angeles CA
|County: Los Angeles
District: District 2
|Effective Date||Status Change|
|1/30/2014||Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA|
|9/24/2011||Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA|
|6/19/2010||Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA|
|10/17/1991||Admitted to The State Bar of California|
Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law in California
State Bar Court Cases
NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx
DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.
|Effective Date||Case Number||Description|
|1/7/2015||07-H-11874||Order re Costs [PDF]|
|2/5/2013||07-H-11874||Order re Costs [PDF]|
|2/3/2012||07-H-11874||Order re Costs [PDF]|
|10/31/2011||07-H-11874||Modification Order [PDF]|
|9/24/2011||09-O-14555||Stipulation [PDF] [HTML]|
|7/13/2011||07-H-11874||Order re Extension of Time [PDF]|
|6/19/2010||07-H-11874||Stipulation [PDF] [HTML]|
|6/19/2010||07-H-11874||Modification Order [PDF]|
|1/27/2010||07-H-11874||Order of Correction [PDF]|
California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries
Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.
September 24, 2011
SCOTT CUMMINGS McKEE, 53, of West Hollywood was suspended for three years, stayed, placed on five years of probation with a six-month actual suspension and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. The order took effect Sept. 24, 2011.McKee stipulated to three acts of misconduct stemming from his representation of a client in a personal injury matter that settled for $175,000. He deposited one check for $165,000 in his client trust account and paid liens held by a previous lawyer and law firm. Although he paid a partial lien held by another previous lawyer, he did not maintain the required $12,000 in his trust account and stipulated he misappropriated that amount, committing an act of moral turpitude. He also disobeyed a court order that designated how the settlement funds were to be distributed.McKee had been disciplined twice previously, with a private reproval in 2005 and a suspension in 2010 for failing to perform legal services competently.In mitigation, he cooperated with the bar’s investigation, demonstrated remorse and had emotional difficulties and severe financial stress.
June 19, 2010
SCOTT CUMMINGS McKEE [#154077], 51, of West Hollywood was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on five years of probation with a 60-day actual suspension and he was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect June 19, 2010.McKee stipulated that he did not comply with conditions attached to a 2005 private reproval that was imposed for improperly withdrawing from a case. He did not make restitution, filed four quarterly probation reports late and did not file the final report.In mitigation, he was diagnosed in 2003 with a terminal illness and has severe financial problems, relying on Social Security, food stamps and renter’s assistance. His mental and physical conditions make it impossible to maintain a full-time law practice or make restitution.