Home > Public >  Attorney Search > Attorney Profile

Attorney Search

Bruce Howard Sobel - #182547

Current Status:  Not eligible to practice law (Not Entitled)

See below for more details.

Profile Information

The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.

Bar Number: 182547    
Address: 110 W C St Ste 1709
San Diego, CA 92101-3909
Phone Number: (619) 235-9200
Fax Number: (619) 231-2890
e-mail: Not Available 
County: San Diego
Undergraduate School: Arizona St Univ; Tempe AZ
District: District 4    
Sections: None Law School: California Western SOL; San Diego CA

Status History

Effective Date Status Change
Present Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA
7/1/2014 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA  
6/7/1996 Admitted to The State Bar of California

Explanation of member status

Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law in California

Effective DateDescriptionCase NumberResulting Status

Disciplinary and Related Actions

Overview of the attorney discipline system.

10/4/2014 Discipline w/actual suspension 12-O-16751 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 

Administrative Actions

7/1/2014 Suspended, failed to pay Bar membr. fees Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 

Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

Explanation of common actions

State Bar Court Cases

NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx

DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.

Effective Date Case Number Description
3/19/2016 14-N-6304 Decision [PDF]
10/4/2014 12-O-16751 Stipulation [PDF]

California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries

Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

October 4, 2014

BRUCE HOWARD SOBEL [#182547], 57, of San Diego, was suspended from the practice of law for three years and ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. He was also placed on three years’ probation and faces a three-year suspension if he does not comply with the rules of his disciplinary probation. The order took effect Oct. 4, 2014. Sobel stipulated to misconduct in nine client matters. In six of the cases he formed a partnership with a non-lawyer, shared fees with a non-lawyer, aided in the unauthorized practice of law, lent his name to be used by a non-attorney and knowingly or grossly made false statements in a response to a State Bar investigation. He also collected advanced fees for loan modification services, did not provide clients with notice that they did not need to seek the help of a third-party to negotiate a loan modification and sought to convince a client to withdraw a State Bar complaint. In addition, he misappropriated client funds, sought to mislead a judge or judicial officer and failed to perform legal services with competence, deposit advanced fees and costs into his client trust account, refund unearned fees, promptly pay client funds, render appropriate accountings to clients, respond to a client’s reasonable status inquiries or keep a client reasonably informed of significant developments in a matter. In April 2010, Sobel began working for Asset Law Center (ALC), a California business owned by non-lawyer Victoria Herrera, which offered home mortgage loan modification assistance and other legal services to help homeowners avoid foreclosure. He later formed a partnership with Herrera to operate ALC. Sobel shared legal fees with ALC’s owner and ALC and received $500 for each case he worked on. In May 2011, he formed a second partnership with Herrera called the Asset Bankruptcy Center (ABC). Similar to the ALC arrangement, Sobel was to provide legal services while Herrera signed up clients, collected legal fees from clients, processed fee agreements and handled day-to-day interactions with clients. They also agreed to divide legal fees. In the course of running the offices, Sobel allowed Herrera and other non-attorneys to sign up new clients, receive fees and give clients legal advice about their chances of getting a home loan modification with no input from him. He also allowed non-attorneys to use his letterhead for retainer agreements. During a State Bar investigation, he submitted statements to the State Bar in the form of written responses. He also testified at a deposition and answered questions under penalty of perjury. A number of Sobel’s statements to the State Bar were false, including that he did not own or manage ALC and that his sole role was as a contract attorney hired by Herrera. He also claimed he did not receive more than $1,500 total in payments from ALC. Sobel was ordered to pay $17,211 plus interest in restitution. In mitigation, Sobel had no prior discipline since being admitted to the practice of law in 1996, entered into a pretrial stipulation with the State Bar and presented evidence demonstrating his good character.

Start New Search »