David James Lola - #231190
The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.
David James Lola, Esq.
4424 Pinoak Dr
Winston-Salem, NC 27104
|Phone Number:||(980) 229-1163|
|Fax Number:||Not Available|
||Undergraduate School:||Univ of Texas; Austin TX|
|Sections:||None||Law School:||Univ of San Diego SOL; San Diego CA|
Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law in California
State Bar Court Cases
NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets.aspx
DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.
|Effective Date||Case Number||Description|
|9/14/2015||14-O-5168||Order re Entry of Default [PDF]|
|7/13/2012||12-C-10899||Stipulation [PDF] [HTML]|
California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries
Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.
August 14, 2016
DAVID JAMES LOLA [#231190], 42, of Winston-Salem, N.C., was disbarred Aug. 14, 2016 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court.Lola was disbarred after his default was entered for failing to respond to a notice of disciplinary charges for not cooperating with a State Bar investigation. He did not seek to have the default set aside or vacated as required under rule 5.85 of the State Bar’s Rules of Procedure and was disbarred.The charges were deemed admitted.He had been disciplined on one prior occasion. In 2012 he was publicly reproved after pleading guilty to carrying a concealed weapon, a misdemeanor.