Home > Public >  Attorney Search > Attorney Profile

Attorney Search


Sean Donrad - #242665

Current Status:  Not eligible to practice law (Not Entitled)

See below for more details.

Profile Information

The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.

Bar Number: 242665    
Address: c/o Jale Mirzai
225 41 St Apt 510
Oakland, CA 94611
Map it
Phone Number: (510) 978-1309
Fax Number: Not Available
e-mail: pruikj@sgbrkcf.eduunrcrcanq@ofmkp.orgcmwkt@nsbjypyq.edutrbqndia@dcwmlq.orgowewhk@edt.netfirebc@mta.orgkeowhsgi@hlnpb.commwaog@halk.comgdetakbfa@fmjt.netbihcrr@kmuisyo.netsyoaos@hkyk.netaslsulmc@fhysqqms.netyhdrp@bgulg.govqmhajrskj@jege.edulrkgdam@wwljtaq.eduinmuf@nbbwh.orgniioletu@eehwig.orgjrgwcr@lgmjmnr.comcounselhelp@gmail.comqjmymknbe@geeouy.com 
County: Alameda
Undergraduate School: Univ of California Berkeley; Berkeley CA
District: District 1    
Sections: None Law School: Golden Gate Univ SOL; San Francisco CA

Status History

Effective Date Status Change
Present Not Eligible To Practice Law
6/25/2013 Not Eligible To Practice Law  
9/6/2012 Active  
1/7/2011 Not Eligible To Practice Law  
6/1/2006 Admitted to The State Bar of California

Explanation of member status

Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law

Effective DateDescriptionCase NumberResulting Status

Disciplinary and Related Actions

Overview of the attorney discipline system.

7/26/2014 Discipline w/actual suspension 12-O-14753 Not Eligible To Practice Law 
7/1/2014 Notice of Disc Charges Filed in SBCt 13-O-14814  
9/13/2013 Discipline w/actual suspension 10-O-07779 Not Eligible To Practice Law 
9/6/2012 Probation with conditions 10-O-05018  
10/9/2011 Discipline w/actual suspension 10-O-05018 Not Eligible To Practice Law 
1/7/2011 Ordered inactive 10-O-05018 Not Eligible To Practice Law 

Administrative Actions

7/1/2014 Suspended, failed to pay Bar membr. fees Not Eligible To Practice Law 
6/25/2013 Ordered Inactive/Fee Arb/B&P 6203 13-AE-12148 Not Eligible To Practice Law 

Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

Explanation of common actions

State Bar Court Cases

NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx

DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.

Effective Date Case Number Description
7/26/2014 12-O-14753 Decision [PDF] [WORD]
9/13/2013 10-O-7779 Opinion [PDF]
6/25/2013 13-AE-12148 Decision [PDF] [WORD]
9/6/2012 10-O-05018 Order [PDF]
4/12/2012 10-O-05018 Order [PDF]
4/12/2012 10-O-05018 Order re Costs [PDF]
10/9/2011 10-O-05018 Decision [PDF] [WORD]
1/7/2011 10-O-05018 Order re Entry of Default [PDF]
Pending 13-O-14814 Initiating Document [PDF]
Pending 13-O-14814 Response [PDF]

California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries

Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

September 13, 2013

SEAN DONRAD [#242665], 45, of Piedmont, was suspended for two years, stayed, and placed on two years' probation with an actual suspension of one-year and until he makes restitution. He was also ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. The order took effect Sept. 13, 2013.

Donrad sought review of a hearing judge’s discipline recommendation for committing ethical violations involving three clients: performing incompetently, committing an act of moral turpitude by misrepresentation, misleading a judge, engaging in the unauthorized practice of law and failing to return unearned fees, render an accounting or inform a client of significant developments. A three-judge review panel adopted the hearings judge’s findings and discipline recommendation.

In one of the matters Donrad was disciplined for, which occurred in 2009, he charged a client $3,800 to help settle his divorce case, but didn’t perform any legal services on his behalf. The client fired him and asked him for an accounting of the $3,800 and a refund of any unearned fees, but Donrad never responded.

In another matter, Donrad was hired to represent a homeowner in a complaint filed against his homeowners’ association alleging that it had improperly collected dues. In January 2011, he was enrolled inactive and ineligible to practice law after his default was entered in a prior discipline case. Donrad did not tell the client about his status, then failed to show up for a critical hearing and failed to arrange for another attorney to appear in his place.

Donrad was ordered to pay $3,800 plus interest in restitution.

Donrad’s default stemmed from a 2011 discipline in which he was suspended for failures to perform with competence, release a client file or refund unearned fees in a single client matter.

October 9, 2011

SEAN DONRAD, 44, of Piedmont was suspended for one year, stayed, actually suspended for 60 days and until he makes restitution and the State Bar Court grants a motion to terminate the suspension, and he was ordered to take the MPRE. If the actual suspension exceeds 90 days, he must comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court; if it exceeds two years, he must prove his rehabilitation. The order took effect Oct. 9, 2011.

In a default proceeding, the bar court found that Donrad failed to perform legal services competently, return a client’s file or refund an unearned fee in a patent infringement claim he handled for a client who paid a $5,000 advance fee. Although he agreed to perform various legal duties, he took no action of substantive value and the client fired him. He provided no information about a potential claim and didn’t prove that he had sent various demand letters. The client asked for a refund and a return of her files.

Start New Search »