Home > Public >  Attorney Search > Attorney Profile

Attorney Search

Frank Offen - #62302

Current Status:  Active

This member is active and may practice law in California.

See below for more details.

Profile Information

The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.

Bar Number: 62302    
Address: Law Ofc Frank Offen
420 3rd St # 210
Oakland, CA 94607
Map it
Phone Number: (510) 832-1104
Fax Number: (510) 832-0761
e-mail: hgkew@owtssqi.netbpil@mrii.comjsfmkga@inoro.netpjhgejuw@fopdhys.eduwyjywmrlg@onpkpbtw.netemlq@pobrmol.netkdnkj@loeenjr.eduqqpddw@epunh.netygquubf@cmnfsuh.comfusnpecg@emdhyy.netlkuhjhata@mbtbpnnc.govraya@kuj.orgyobru@rywelu.govfedloqo@jtlsjj.edulrfeitlc@llqwlhob.govrihwcyiph@kpk.eduawjo@cffrskny.edufoffen@sbcglobal.netmcnbii@ipdjjawa.edusppsclt@dsjhmapu.edu 
County: Alameda
Undergraduate School: Univ of California; CA
District: District 1    
Sections: None Law School: Golden Gate Univ SOL; San Francisco CA

Status History

Effective Date Status Change
Present Active
12/18/1974 Admitted to The State Bar of California

Explanation of member status

Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law in California

Effective DateDescriptionCase NumberResulting Status

Disciplinary and Related Actions

Overview of the attorney discipline system.

5/14/2005 Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 04-O-11274  

Administrative Actions

This member has no public record of administrative actions.

Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

Explanation of common actions

California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries

Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

May 14, 2005

FRANK OFFEN [#62302], 57, of Oakland was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on one year of probation and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect May 14, 2005.

Offen filed a personal injury lawsuit on behalf of a client but did not file a proof of service and claims he did not receive notice of a conference with the court. The court dismissed the case, but Offen claims he did not receive the order. The defendant did not receive notice of the dismissal because it had not made a court appearance prior to the dismissal.

Offen served the defendant with the complaint after the case was dismissed. The defendant learned of the dismissal when its lawyer attempted to file her answer. Offen did not take any steps to respond to discovery or to prepare his client for her deposition, and he failed to appear at the deposition.

Months later, Offen gave his client form interrogatories and asked her to prepare responses. At the time, he knew the case was dismissed. The client finally learned of the dismissal when she went to court herself — 23 months after the case was dismissed. Offen told her the court had made a mistake, that he didn’t know about the dismissal and that he would petition the court to reopen the case. He did no further work.

He stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently or keep a client informed about developments in her case.

In mitigation, he has no prior discipline and he agreed to compensate his client.

Start New Search »