Home > Public >  Attorney Search > Attorney Profile

Attorney Search

 

Edward Francis Graziano - #71034

Current Status:  Disbarred

This member is prohibited from practicing law in California by order of the California Supreme Court.

See below for more details.

Profile Information

The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.

Bar Number: 71034    
Address: P O Box 20935
Riverside, CA 92516
Phone Number: (800) 568-5457
Fax Number: (909) 931-4957
e-mail: Not Available 
County: Riverside
Undergraduate School: Stanford Univ; Stanford CA
District: District 4    
Sections: None Law School: Columbia Univ SOL; New York NY

Status History

Effective Date Status Change
Present Disbarred
12/18/1997 Disbarred  
12/4/1991 Not Eligible To Practice Law  
2/1/1985 Active  
4/15/1983 Inactive  
12/22/1976 Admitted to The State Bar of California

Explanation of member status

Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law

Effective DateDescriptionCase NumberResulting Status

Disciplinary and Related Actions

Overview of the attorney discipline system.

12/18/1997 Disbarment 90-C-17197 Disbarred 
8/28/1997 Ordered inactive 90-C-17197 Not Eligible To Practice Law 
1/7/1995 Discipline w/actual suspension 92-N-10498 Not Eligible To Practice Law 
12/4/1991 Interim suspension after conviction 91-C-03418 Not Eligible To Practice Law 

Administrative Actions

This member has no public record of administrative actions.


Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

Explanation of common actions

California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries

Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

December 18, 1997

EDWARD FRANCIS GRAZIANO [#71034], 51, of Riverside was disbarred Dec. 18, 1997.

The bar court’s review department granted the State Bar’s request that the discipline recommended by the hearing department (stayed disbarment, five years of probation and a five-year suspension) be increased to disbarment.

Graziano’s discipline is the result of two consolidated conviction matters — one involves convictions for making hundreds of annoying and threatening telephone calls, and the second involves a perjury conviction for lying on a welfare application. He has been on interim suspension since 1991.

Graziano represented his personal physician as corporate attorney for a small company and as the doctor’s bankruptcy lawyer. The two entered into a retainer agreement which prohibited the doctor from firing Graziano except for cause.

When the bankruptcy court denied the doctor’s discharge in bankruptcy, Graziano insisted on filing numerous appeals. However, his client persuaded Graziano to drop the appeals. The relationship between attorney and doctor eventually deteriorated so much that, at one point, Graziano physically threw the doctor out of his home, slashed all four tires on his car and eventually was arrested. When the doctor fired him, Graziano responded with a 25-page, single-spaced letter which included a variety of threats.

During the following three years, Graziano made thousands of threatening and abusive telephone calls to the doctor’s office. He threatened to blow up a nurse’s car and rearrange another employee’s face with a tire iron. Some days, he made more than 100 calls, and during one period, Graziano tied up all 12 phone lines in the doctor’s clinic for more than two hours.

The doctor hired a security guard and obtained an injunction against Graziano, who eventually was convicted of three counts of making annoying phone calls.

Graziano also was convicted of felony perjury for making false statements on welfare applications. He indicated his four children were living with him. In fact, his ex-wife had taken the children to Australia, where she received public assistance.

Graziano unsuccessfully appealed that conviction to the California Court of Appeal, California Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court.

During the time of his misconduct, Graziano was taking large quantities of Xanax, a mood-altering tranquilizer, as well as diet pills. He suffers from agoraphobia and bipolar disorder. However, the court did not find that he was adequately rehabilitated.

Graziano was placed on interim suspension after the perjury conviction in 1991 and was ordered to comply with rule 955 of the California Rules of Court, but he did not do so. He failed to cooperate with the bar’s investigation, failed to appear at hearings, and filed declarations denying any wrongdoing.

In one, he wrote, “I regret nothing that I have done. Not a single solitary thing. And if given the exact set of circumstances in which I found my self, I would commit ‘perjury’ again and I would make ‘annoying telephone calls’ again and again and again. Wake up and smell the coffee!”


Start New Search »