Home > Public >  Attorney Search > Attorney Profile

Attorney Search


Jerry A LaCues - #77088

Current Status:  Disbarred

This member is prohibited from practicing law in California by order of the California Supreme Court.

See below for more details.

Profile Information

The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.

Bar Number: 77088    
Address: Law Ofc Jerry A LaCues
1925 Scenic Ridge Dr
Chino Hills, CA 91709
Phone Number: (909) 331-2520
Fax Number: Not Available
e-mail: psirhhk@fkcl.comfdkncakt@dgdussl.edutmmitpkk@tjr.edujuoeoikc@mmjkur.orgjlacues@hotmail.comogrlqyj@scqwwjn.govawppygj@hjnh.comknnuenj@upjpih.edurhohpukbc@ofiejy.orgiqqdjnkqm@rudq.netwbry@gkha.govlktr@wkykqadr.educcnqdb@nipht.orgmrlwji@wwwee.eduwijco@jhlfbnt.goviahgu@jpa.orgtutwa@kwwrd.govkfwqr@kmj.orgaoamm@ketdjffd.govnycigm@tgtmu.com 
County: San Bernardino
Undergraduate School: California St Univ; San Bernardino CA
District: District 4    
Sections: None Law School: Southwestern Univ SOL; Los Angeles CA

Status History

Effective Date Status Change
Present Disbarred
1/19/2017 Disbarred  
12/17/2015 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA  
7/21/2015 Active  
7/1/2015 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA  
4/20/2015 Active  
2/13/2015 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA  
1/6/2013 Active  
12/6/2012 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA  
8/4/2012 Active  
7/4/2012 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA  
12/21/1977 Admitted to The State Bar of California

Explanation of member status

Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law in California

Effective DateDescriptionCase NumberResulting Status

Disciplinary and Related Actions

Overview of the attorney discipline system.

1/19/2017 Disbarment 14-O-04728 Disbarred 
8/14/2016 Ordered inactive 14-O-04728 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 
1/29/2016 Ordered inactive 14-O-04728 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 
12/17/2015 Discipline w/actual suspension 13-O-15018 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 
2/13/2015 Ordered inactive 13-O-15018 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 
12/6/2012 Discipline w/actual suspension 12-O-10271 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 
7/4/2012 Discipline w/actual suspension 11-O-10016 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 

Administrative Actions

7/1/2015 Suspended, failed to pay Bar membr. fees Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 
7/1/2015 Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 


Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

Explanation of common actions

State Bar Court Cases

NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx

DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.

Effective Date Case Number Description
1/19/2017 14-O-4728 Decision [PDF]
1/29/2016 14-O-4728 Order re Entry of Default [PDF]
12/17/2015 13-O-15018 Stipulation [PDF]
4/20/2015 13-O-15018 Order re Inactive Enrollment [PDF]
2/13/2015 13-O-15018 Order re Entry of Default [PDF]
12/6/2012 12-O-10271 Stipulation [PDF] [HTML]
7/4/2012 11-O-10016 Stipulation [PDF] [HTML]

California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries

Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

January 19, 2017

JERRY A. LACUES [#77088], 66, of Chino Hills, was disbarred Jan. 19, 2017 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court.

In one matter, LaCues appeared on behalf of a client without authority, sought to mislead a judge by filing an answer to a complaint even though he had not been authorized to, simulated the client’s signature on a settlement document and failed to respond to a letter from the State Bar inquiring about the misconduct allegations against him.

In another matter, he failed to comply with two court orders requiring he pay $500 and $1,000 in sanctions and did not report the $1,000 in sanctions to the State Bar. He also failed to provide a substantive response to two letters from the State Bar inquiring about the allegations against him.

LaCues was disbarred after his default was entered for failing to respond to a notice of disciplinary charges. Because he made no effort to have the default set aside, he was disbarred and the charges against him deemed admitted. LaCues had four prior records of discipline.

December 17, 2015

JERRY A. LACUES [#77088], 65, of Chino Hills, was suspended from the practice of law for one year and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. He was also placed on two years’ probation and faces a two-year suspension if he does not comply with the terms of his disciplinary probation. The order took effect Dec. 17, 2015.

For more than three years LaCues misrepresented to a client that he was pursuing the client’s claims against a bank. He also said he had reached a settlement when he hadn’t. In addition, he failed to respond to a letter from a State Bar investigator looking into the allegations against him. In mitigation, LaCues admitted to his misconduct and entered into a pretrial stipulation with the State Bar.

He had three prior records of discipline. He was suspended twice in 2012 for failing to promptly pay out settlement funds as requested by his client, maintain a proper balance in his trust account or perform legal services competently. He was also privately reproved in 2004 for failing to perform legal services competently.

December 6, 2012

JERRY A. LaCUES [#77088], 62, of Chino Hills was suspended for two years, stayed, and placed on three years of probation with an actual 30-day suspension. The order took effect Dec. 6, 2012.

LaCues stipulated that he failed to promptly pay out settlement funds as requested by his client. While representing a married couple, he settled a construction defect matter for $15,000. During the course of the case, his clients separated but each agreed to accept $5,000 with the remainder to go to LaCues for attorney fees.

Although LaCues paid $5,000 to the wife, a dispute later arose between the couple, resulting in a delay of the final payout. When the couple finally agreed that $5,000 should go to the husband, LaCues did not distribute the money due to the press of business in his office. He ultimately gave the husband $10,000, forgoing his fee to make up for the delay.

In mitigation, LaCues cooperated with the bar’s investigation and gave up his fee.

LaCues was privately reproved in 2004 for failing to perform legal services competently and he was suspended last year after admitting to two counts of misconduct in two matters: he failed to perform legal services competently or maintain a proper balance in his trust account.

July 4, 2012

JERRY A. LaCUES, 61, of Chino Hills was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 30-day actual suspension and he was ordered to take the MPRE. The order took effect July 4, 2012.

He stipulated to two counts of misconduct in two matters.

In the first, he received $120,000 from a bankruptcy trustee on behalf of a client, but allowed the balance in his client trust account to fall below the required amount. He gave the client $80,000 but only an additional $8,200 of the $20,000 he still owed. His client trust account balance fell to $67.06. He eventually paid the client $16,300 but stipulated that he did not maintain a proper balance in his trust account.

In a malpractice case, LaCues repeatedly told his client he was working on the matter when he was not. Although he filed a lawsuit, he then dismissed it pursuant to an arbitration clause. The client repeatedly contacted LaCues for more than six years, but he failed to schedule an arbitration hearing or contact opposing counsel. He stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently.

LaCues was privately reproved in 2004 for failing to perform legal services competently.


Start New Search »