Home > Public >  Attorney Search > Attorney Profile

Attorney Search

 

Steven Mark Bishop - #81618

Current Status:  Active

This member is active and may practice law in California.

See below for more details.

Profile Information

The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.

Bar Number: 81618    
Address: 591 Camino De La Reina
Ste 1120
San Diego, CA 92108
Map it
Phone Number: (619) 299-9780
Fax Number: Not Available
e-mail: nrtnadi@yfadywf.govwjrbm@lodtfin.orgwutssf@qwna.combhebtfsb@nclqeby.orgswjs@sughtd.govjglhy@rkdf.govnwmmpgghn@fskjwyyb.edugibhprkam@anujpo.comwpdt@cge.netblua@iroigh.comsrqttpyq@dwfdeto.orgejhbsr@byb.netmcflh@fudpk.orggeiiaol@ysswj.govqapmotm@rjhnc.orgsteve@stevenmbishop.comsnaudn@eek.eduenaakuao@rkutro.comppot@dqrnqtlm.comgapjh@mujcnf.gov 
County: San Diego
Undergraduate School: San Diego State Univ; San Diego CA
District: District 4    
Sections: Family Law
Law School: Univ of San Diego SOL; San Diego CA
Certified Legal Specialty: Family Law (State Bar of California)

Status History

Effective Date Status Change
Present Active
11/29/1978 Admitted to The State Bar of California

Explanation of member status

Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law

Effective DateDescriptionCase NumberResulting Status

Disciplinary and Related Actions

Overview of the attorney discipline system.

11/13/2014 Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 13-O-10628  

Administrative Actions

This member has no public record of administrative actions.


Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

Explanation of common actions

State Bar Court Cases

NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx

DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.

Effective Date Case Number Description
1/26/2015 13-O-10628 Order re Costs [PDF]
11/13/2014 13-O-10628 Stipulation [PDF]

California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries

Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

November 13, 2014

STEVEN MARK BISHOP [#81618], 62, of San Diego, was placed on one year of probation and faces a one-year suspension if he does not comply with the terms. He was also ordered to take the MPRE. The order took effect Nov. 13, 2014. Bishop stipulated that he withdrew funds when he knew his client disputed his claim to fees and costs instead of placing the disputed funds in his client trust account. Beginning in 2010, Bishop represented the wife in a divorce case and entered into a lien agreement whereby he would collect fees and costs from any recovery he obtained on her behalf. In October of that year, his office mistakenly charged $2,500 to her credit card. That December, the client fired Bishop and hired a new attorney, who requested that Bishop transfer funds he was holding on the client’s behalf into a court-segregated trust account as well as provide an accounting. Instead, Bishop sent a check for a lesser amount with a letter explaining that he withdrew his outstanding fees and costs from the entrusted funds. At the time, Bishop knew about the dispute. After Bishop learned of the State Bar’s investigation into the matter, he returned the disputed funds to his client trust account. On April 25, 2014, he refunded $5,578.89 to the client, which represented the $2,500 that was erroneously charged to her credit card account and money he withdrew from the court-ordered segregated trust account. In mitigation, Bishop had no prior record of discipline, entered into a pretrial stipulation with the State Bar and presented evidence of his good character.


Start New Search »