Home > Public >  Attorney Search > Attorney Profile

Attorney Search


Robert G. Scurrah Jr - #82766

Current Status:  Disbarred

This member is prohibited from practicing law in California by order of the California Supreme Court.

See below for more details.

Profile Information

The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.

Bar Number: 82766    
Address: Law Offices of Robert G Scurrah
145 W Main St Ste 200
Tustin, CA 92780
Map it
Phone Number: (714) 551-9930
Fax Number: (714) 464-3434
e-mail: haqncpmc@kub.comrhpjauo@nnfrgp.edufdwyao@irbjhqrw.netqwembj@cwmo.govadbes@gheape.orgmisor@ynanloa.netbmmbr@psu.comassu@lmutw.govlobkjgtoy@aheuy.orgyjhbjadjd@funyeqfj.govrpwqjwjb@qbewhupf.orggupdjecg@fuomfpl.orgsbjmjjrm@rqbcdk.netggyjqdj@bgj.edurcfyru@wfrohpa.comfulmro@pjf.govqqrcs@ijnqa.orgajmob@eamugo.comrscurrah@earthlink.netcralab@lfwule.gov 
County: Orange
Undergraduate School: San Diego State Univ; San Diego CA
District: District 4    
Sections: None Law School: American COL; Brea CA

Status History

Effective Date Status Change
Present Disbarred
2/4/2017 Disbarred  
10/9/2015 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA  
11/29/1978 Admitted to The State Bar of California

Explanation of member status

Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law in California

Effective DateDescriptionCase NumberResulting Status

Disciplinary and Related Actions

Overview of the attorney discipline system.

2/4/2017 Disbarment 16-N-10396 Disbarred 
9/2/2016 Ordered inactive 16-N-10396 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 
6/18/2016 Discipline w/actual suspension 12-O-17964 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 
4/8/2016 Ordered inactive 16-N-10396 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 
10/9/2015 Discipline w/actual suspension 11-O-17398 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 

Administrative Actions

This member has no public record of administrative actions.


Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

Explanation of common actions

State Bar Court Cases

NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx

DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.

Effective Date Case Number Description
2/4/2017 16-N-10396 Decision [PDF]
6/18/2016 12-O-17964 Decision [PDF]
4/8/2016 16-N-10396 Order re Entry of Default [PDF]
1/5/2016 12-O-17964 Order Amending Decision [PDF]
10/9/2015 11-O-17398 Opinion [PDF] [WORD]

California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries

Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

June 18, 2016

ROBERT G. SCURRAH JR. [#82766], 68, of Tustin, was suspended from the practice of law for six months and until he makes restitution to clients for improperly collecting advance fees for loan modification services. He was placed on probation for one year. He must pass the test given by the State Bar Ethics School and the MPRE. The order took effect June 18, 2016.

The case arose out of Scurrah’s dispute with the State Bar over changes to the Civil Code in 2009 that prohibited collection of fees in advance of the performance of loan modification services. Scurrah sought to structure his fee agreements to comply with the statue, but he was found by the State Bar Court in 2015 to be in violation. That resulted in a 90-day actual suspension and a restitution order totaling more than $25,000. Subsequently, the State Bar filed new disciplinary charges alleging 23 additional violations, to which Scurrah stipulated culpability.


Start New Search »