Home > Public >  Attorney Search > Attorney Profile

Attorney Search

Kristin Lynn Day - #269679

Attorney Provided Information

The information below was provided by the attorney and has not been verified or monitored. The State Bar does not recommend or endorse any attorney.

Practice Area(s):

Other Language(s) Spoken by the Law Office Staff:


Current Status:  Disbarred

This member is prohibited from practicing law in California by order of the California Supreme Court.

See below for more details.

Profile Information

The following information is from the official records of The State Bar of California.

Bar Number: 269679
Day Legal Services
1911 Douglas Blvd
Ste 85 PMB 245
Roseville, CA 95661
Phone Number: (916) 256-4616
Fax Number: (855) 432-9534
e-mail: dkmn@sol.edurknbnfm@kmm.edukldjkmsjg@imusuhjd.govdlqrg@bsbfeklh.edutmgccei@una.netkristin@daylegalservices.comiypnh@ycbhfboc.netpwcf@nqqfy.orgywmuogki@onfjc.govguymsw@aohr.netnuje@nuptyyie.comhbplqjfu@jiei.edubcftnrmgb@ecygfwl.comrcsej@sou.comkdimfjb@pktwegpu.comddyucrhhl@ptssiii.edusinde@gffkklm.educhasiiyuk@onw.comjhkklbqm@rsphpn.govpgucpq@dtjyr.edu 
Undergraduate School:
Baylor Univ; Waco TX
Law School:
Indiana Univ Bloomington SOL; IN
County: Placer
District: District 3

Status History

Effective Date Status Change
Present Disbarred
4/23/2014 Disbarred  
11/21/2013 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA  
6/1/2010 Admitted to The State Bar of California

Explanation of member status

Actions Affecting Eligibility to Practice Law in California

Effective DateDescriptionCase NumberResulting Status

Disciplinary and Related Actions

Overview of the attorney discipline system.

4/23/2014 Disbarment 12-O-10714 Disbarred 
11/21/2013 Ordered inactive 12-O-10714 Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA 

Administrative Actions

This member has no public record of administrative actions.

Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

Explanation of common actions

State Bar Court Cases

NOTE: The State Bar Court began posting public discipline documents online in 2005. The format and pagination of documents posted on this site may vary from the originals in the case file as a result of their translation from the original format into Word and PDF. Copies of additional related documents in a case are available upon request. Only Opinions designated for publication in the State Bar Court Reporter may be cited or relied on as precedent in State Bar Court proceedings. For further information about a case that is displayed here, please refer to the State Bar Court's online docket, which can be found at: http://apps.statebarcourt.ca.gov/dockets/dockets.aspx

DISCLAIMER: Any posted Notice of Disciplinary Charges, Conviction Transmittal or other initiating document, contains only allegations of professional misconduct. The attorney is presumed to be innocent of any misconduct warranting discipline until the charges have been proven.

Effective Date Case Number Description
4/23/2014 12-O-10714 Stipulation [PDF] [HTML]

California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries

Summaries from the California Bar Journal are based on discipline orders but are not the official records. Not all discipline actions have associated CBJ summaries. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request.

April 23, 2014

KRISTIN LYNN DAY [#269679], 35 of Roseville was disbarred April 23, 2014 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court and make restitution.

Day stipulated to misconduct in nine matters: aiding a person or entity in the unauthorized practice of law, lending her name to be used as attorney by another person who was not an attorney, forming a law partnership with a non-lawyer, sharing fees with a non-lawyer, the unauthorized practice of law in another state, committing acts of moral turpitude and failing to perform legal services with competence or return unearned fees.

The charges stemmed from a partnership Day started with a non-lawyer called United Foreclosure Attorney Network, which purported to provide mortgage litigation and other debt-related services to borrowers and property owners. Day was not involved in the decision whether to accept new clients. Instead, non-attorney legal assistants took on that role and provided legal advice without attorney supervision. Clients paid upfront fees but received no services of value.

Day was ordered to pay $41,578.50 plus interest in restitution.

In mitigation, she entered into a prefiling stipulation with the State Bar and presented evidence of her good character.

Start New Search »